DRR decision adequacy before authoring
Route
route:drr-decision-adequacy-before-authoring
What this page is
This is an FPF route: a curated working path through pattern IDs. It is not a website route or application navigation route.
Methodology
Use the ordered steps as the first path through the framework. Treat optional steps, landing points, route surfaces, and reroutes as controls for scope, ownership, and common wrong turns. Open exact pattern pages only when the work depends on their wording.
- First Honest Burden: "Can I draft from this DRR without inventing missing FPF decisions, receiving-locus requirements, source-use payload, or accepted-decision carry-through?"
E.21 when the object version under quality read is an authored FPF pattern version; E.19 when the live question is admission or refresh review; A.10, B.3, A.21, or A.15 when the claim is project evidence, assurance, gate, or work; C.16/A.17-A.19 when measurement or scale legality is live
Route surfaces
- E.9.DA DRR Decision-Adequacy Evaluation CharacteristicSpace
- E.9 Design-Rationale Record (DRR) Method
- E.10 LEX-BUNDLE: Unified Lexical Rules for FPF
Typical next owners
Citations
J.4
Last Updated: 2026-05-31 — upstream FPF commit 16cd3138 (github.com/ailev/FPF)