Preface Catalog
What this page is
This catalog lists generated reference pages from FPF preface and supporting sections. These pages explain how to read the specification; they are not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use these pages when you need interpretation guidance before applying a route or pattern. For active work, return to Start Here, a route, or a work packet after the reading burden is clear.
First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Table of Contents
First Principles Framework (FPF) Readme
- First Principles Framework (FPF) Readme
- Start here
- Practical entries
- LIVE-WORK-STEERING — Choose the next action while Work is changing
- METHOD-RECOVERY — Explain what reusable way several performances may show
- PROFESSIONAL-RESULT — Use one result from another practice without transferring the decision
- NAMING — Give one identified thing a usable name
- SYSTEM-RECOGNITION — Test systemhood only when it changes the decision
- TIME — Decide what a timing claim lets you do
- CAUSAL-USE — Keep a causal-looking result within its support
- MEASUREMENT — Make a number interpretable before relying on it
- MATHEMATICAL-MODELING — Obtain a useful consequence from a representation
- METHOD-CONSTRUCTION — Construct, connect and change methods for practical use
- WORK-OPPORTUNITY — Find a useful continuation before proposing change
- COMMUNICATION-FOR-USE — Make communication useful, then learn from what happens
- RESULT-TO-NEXT-MOVE — Route an obtained result to the next probe or option
- ACTUAL-TEMPORAL-STRUCTURE — Recover what actually obtains before testing coordination
- CONSEQUENCE-BEARERS — Find omitted Systems before closing a decision
- Practical-Use Cards
- UNFAMILIAR-THEORY - Make an unfamiliar theory usable
- PHYSICAL-RESULT - Connect physics, mathematics and computation
- Expansion for PHYSICAL-RESULT
- ARCHITECTURE — Carry an outside need through structure and feedback
- PRACTICE-ARCHITECTURE — Connect methods with their use, support and development
- WORKING-DOCUMENTS — Make a document answer one use
- OPTION-COMPARISON — Keep unlike option results distinct
- PROBLEM-SHAPING — Stop at the earliest honest problem-side result
- IMPROVEMENT — Define better before repeating change
- WORDING — Repair language without replacing the project question
- SOTA-PORTFOLIO — Move from a plural field to the cheapest useful result
- SYSTEM-DELIMITATION — Separate parts, selected boundary, and crossings
- Decide Whether FPF Fits
- When Several Transformation Flows Form One Network
- Perform several levels of work through one action
- Recover a lost path from outside use to recursive builders
- One-Minute Example
- What FPF Is
- What FPF Is Not
- How to Use This Repository
- License and reuse
- Citation
Preface (non-normative)
- Preface (non-normative)
- FPF.Preface:1 - What This Specification Is And How To Use It
- FPF.Preface:1.1 - Four ordinary starts before a PatternID
- FPF.Preface:2 - FPF As A Project, Not Only A Pattern List
- FPF.Preface:3 - Why FPF Exists
- FPF.Preface:4 - Creativity And Assurance Mature Together
- FPF.Preface:5 - Local Closure Inside An Open World
- FPF.Preface:6 - FPF As An Evolutionary Architecture For Thought
- FPF.Preface:7 - Architectural Characteristics Of Thought
- FPF.Preface:8 - Beyond Bias Hunting
- FPF.Preface:9 - Thinking Through Writing
- FPF.Preface:10 - Thinking-Oriented Architecture, Not A Descriptive Upper Ontology
- FPF.Preface:11 - When A Scale Claim Calls For Comparison
- FPF.Preface:12 - From Flat Documents To Multi-View Truth
- FPF.Preface:13 - Architecture As Structure Of Holons
- FPF.Preface:14 - Boundary Statements
- FPF.Preface:15 - Raising Semantic Precision
- FPF.Preface:16 - Big FPF Storylines
- FPF.Preface:16.1 - Follow one question through several contributions
- FPF.Preface:16.2 - Architectural Rationale
- FPF.Preface:16.3 - Shared sources and the choices they support
- FPF.Preface:16.4 - What to examine when adapting the arrangement
- FPF.Preface:16.5 - Construct a usable whole with existing methods
- FPF.Preface:16.5.1 - Start outside the proposed boundary
- FPF.Preface:16.5.2 - Recover the construction and select the next operation
- FPF.Preface:16.5.3 - Compare constructions and return to use
- FPF.Preface:16.5.4 - Explanation and night coverage
- FPF.Preface:16.5.4.1 - Recover the receiving result
- FPF.Preface:16.5.4.2 - Compare proposed ways to meet the need
- FPF.Preface:16.5.4.3 - Specify the missing procurement and operating results
- FPF.Preface:16.5.4.4 - Return the result and its remaining conditions
- FPF.Preface:16.5.5 - An interpretable pressure assessment
- FPF.Preface:16.5.5.1 - Recover the pressure question and its inputs
- FPF.Preface:16.5.5.2 - Form and interpret the pressure assessment
- FPF.Preface:16.5.5.3 - Change the input and retain the applicable reasoning
- FPF.Preface:16.6 - Develop a useful way from received material
- FPF.Preface:17 - Transdisciplinarity As A Meta-Theory Of Thinking
- FPF.Preface:18 - The Culinary Architecture Of Collective Thought
- FPF.Preface:19 - The Intellect Stack As A Pedagogical Map
- FPF.Preface:20 - Purpose, Scope, And Non-Goals
- FPF.Preface:21 - How To Continue After The readme
- FPF.Preface:End
Part A - Kernel Architecture Cluster
- Part A - Kernel Architecture Cluster
- A.0:End
- A.1:End
- A.1.RI:End
- A.1.1:End
- A.1.SCR:End
- A.1.CSD:End
- A.1.STM:End
- A.2:End
- A.2.1:End
- A.2.2:End
- A.2.3:End
- A.2.4:End
- A.2.5:End
- A.2.6:End
- A.2.7:End
- A.2.8:End
- A.2.8.PER:End
- A.2.9 — U.SpeechAct — Communicative Work and Its Intended Use
- A.2.9:1 — Problem frame
- A.2.9:2 — Problem
- A.2.9:3 — Forces
- A.2.9:4 — Solution
- A.2.9:4.1 — Normative definition
- A.2.9:4.2 — Minimal occurrence-description record (normative)
- A.2.9:4.3 — SpeechActRef discipline (normative)
- A.2.9:4.4 — Separation rules with U.Commitment, GrantedPermissionRelation@Context, and U.PromiseContent (normative)
- A.2.9:4.5 — Multi-function and multi-party support (normative)
- A.2.9:5 — Archetypal Grounding (Tell–Show–Show)
- A.2.9:5.1 — Tell (universal rule)
- A.2.9:5.2 — Show #1 (system archetype: change-control approval gates a deployment)
- A.2.9:6 — Bias-Annotation
- A.2.9:7 — Conformance Checklist (normative)
- A.2.9:8 — Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- A.2.9:9 — Consequences
- A.2.9:10 — Rationale
- A.2.9:11 — SoTA-Echoing (informative; current alignment with one historical anchor)
- A.2.9:12 — Relations
- A.2.9:End
- A.3:End
- A.3.1:End
- A.3.1.MR:End
- A.3.2:End
- A.3.3:End
- A.3.3.CC:End
- A.3.3.TR:End
- A.3.3.PI:End
- A.3.4:End
- A.3.4.P:End
- A.4:End
- A.5:End
Cluster A.IV.A - Signature Stack & Boundary Discipline (A.6.)*
- *Cluster A.IV.A - Signature Stack & Boundary Discipline (A.6.)**
- A.6:End
- A.6.RSIG:End
- A.6.B — Boundary Norm Square (Laws / Admissibility / Deontics / Work‑Effects)
- A.6.B:0 — Conventions
- A.6.B:1 — Problem frame
- A.6.B:2 — Problem
- A.6.B:3 — Forces
- A.6.B:4.2 — The square
- A.6.B:4.3 — Canonical placements in the Signature Stack
- A.6.B:5 — Quadrant specifications
- A.6.B:5.1 — Quadrant L: Laws & Definitions
- A.6.B:5.2 — Quadrant A: Admissibility & Gates
- A.6.B:5.3 — Quadrant D: Deontics & Commitments
- A.6.B:5.4 — Quadrant E: Work‑Effects & Evidence
- A.6.B:6 — Cross‑quadrant link discipline
- A.6.B:6.1 — Explicit reference rule
- A.6.B:6.2 — Canonical cross‑quadrant dependency patterns
- A.6.B:6.3 — The “triangle decomposition” for mixed sentences
- A.6.B:6.4 — Dependency direction (no “upward” imports)
- A.6.B:7 — Mini-register: Claim Register (informative, recommended)
- A.6.B:8.4 — Worked Rewrite Kit (informative, recommended)
- A.6.B:9 — Bias‑Annotation
- A.6.B:10 — Conformance Checklist
- A.6.B:12 — Consequences
- A.6.B:13 — Rationale
- A.6.B:14 — SoTA‑Echoing (post‑2015 practice alignment)
- A.6.B:15 — Relations
- A.6.B:End
- A.6.C — Contract Unpacking for Boundaries
- A.6.C:1 — Problem frame
- A.6.C:2 — Problem
- A.6.C:3 — Forces
- A.6.C:4 — Solution
- A.6.C:4.1 — Four questions for contract-like boundary wording
- A.6.C:4.2 — Classification recipe into A.6.B (L/A/D/E)
- A.6.C:4.3 — “Guarantee” disambiguation
- A.6.C:4.4 — MVPK faces are not second contracts
- A.6.C:4.5 — A.6.B Claim Register additions (recommended)
- A.6.C:5 — Archetypal Grounding (Tell–Show–Show)
- A.6.C:5.1 — Tell
- A.6.C:5.2 — Show (System archetypes)
- A.6.C:5.3 — Show (Episteme archetypes)
- A.6.C:6 — Bias-Annotation
- A.6.C:7 — Conformance Checklist
- A.6.C:8 — Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- A.6.C:9 — Consequences
- A.6.C:10 — Rationale
- A.6.C:11 — SoTA‑Echoing (informative; post‑2015 alignment)
- A.6.C:12 — Relations
- A.6.C:End
- A.6.REL:End
- A.6.0:End
- A.6.1:End
- A.6.2:End
- A.6.3:End
- A.6.3.CSC:End
- A.6.3.CR:End
- A.6.3.RT:End
- A.6.3.RT.OE:End
- A.6.3.NAR:End
- A.6.4:End
- A.6.P:End
- A.6.P.RI:End
- A.6.P.WMR:End
- A.6.RCD:End
- A.6.RSIR:End
- A.6.A:End
- A.6.F:End
- A.6.M:End
- A.6.5:End
- A.6.6:End
- A.6.7:End
- A.6.9:End
- A.6.S:End
- A.6.H:End
Cluster A.V - Constitutional Principles of the Kernel
- Cluster A.V - Constitutional Principles of the Kernel
- A.7:End
- A.7.1:End
- A.7.2:End
- A.7.CP:End
- A.8:End
- A.9:End
- A.10:End
- A.10.1:End
- A.11:End
- A.11.OP:End
- A.12:End
- A.13:End
- A.14:End
- A.15:End
- A.15.1:End
- A.15.2:End
- A.15.3:End
- A.15.4:End
- A.15.5:End
- A.15.6:End
- A.15.7:End
- A.15.8:End
- A.15.9:End
- A.15.10:End
- A.15.11:End
- A.15.PROD:End
- A.16:End
- A.16.0:End
- A.16.1:End
- A.16.2:End
- A.17:End
- A.18:End
- A.19:End
- A.19.ECS:End
- A.19.SPR:End
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE - Source-Set and Search/Outcome-Space Substrate
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:0 - Use this when
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:0.1 - What goes wrong if missed
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:0.2 - What this buys
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:0.a - TERM/LEX token-status guard (local-first)
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:0.b - First-minute operator cue and confusion guide
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:1 - Problem frame
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:2 - Problem
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:3 - Forces
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4 - Solution
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.1 - Declared relation-and-ref-position stack and outside work
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.2 - Minimal declaration stack
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.3 - Substrate declaration laws (SS-0..SS-7)
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.4 - Profiles
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.5 - Operational declaration sequence (fail-closed)
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.6 - Canonical rewrite forms
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.7 - Conditional fields stay conditional
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.8 - Qualifier refs stay substrate-side
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.9 - Descriptor maps and distance definitions dock here, but do not replace the space refs
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.10 - Publication and shipping remain downstream consumers
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.11 - Ordinary and heavier use
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.12 - Operator kit: choose, declare, self-check, apply governing neighbor
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:4.13 - Using the substrate with neighboring patterns
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:5.1 - System
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:5.2 - Episteme
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:5.3 - Boundary anti-case
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:5.4 - Use-situation spread
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:6 - Bias-Annotation
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:7 - Conformance Checklist
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:9 - Consequences
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:10 - Rationale
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:12 - Relations
- A.19.SOURCE-SET-SPACE-SUBSTRATE:End
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW - Interpretive Views of Declared Source Sets and Search/Outcome Spaces
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:0 - Use this when
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:0.1 - What goes wrong if missed
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:0.2 - What this buys
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:0.a - TERM/LEX token-status guard (local-first)
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:0.b - First-minute operator cue and confusion guide
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:1 - Problem frame
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:2 - Problem
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:3 - Forces
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4 - Solution
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.1 - Declared-substrate interpretive-view record and outside work
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.2 - Minimal interpretive view declaration
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.3 - Interpretive-view declaration laws (IV-0..IV-8)
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.4 - Profiles
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.5 - Operational declaration sequence (fail-closed)
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.6 - Thin interpretation remains a complete admissible form
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.7 - Atlas form is fuller interpretation and needs a complete record
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.8 - No autonomous local view law is introduced here
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.9 - Qualifier refs stay substrate-side
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.10 - Publication, set-result, and pool-policy boundaries
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.11 - G.2 keeps the tradition-facing atlas specialization
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.12 - Operator kit: choose, record, preserve, apply governing neighbor
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.13 - Using the interpretive view with neighboring patterns
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:5.1 - System
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:5.2 - Episteme
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:5.3 - Boundary anti-case
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:5.4 - Use-situation spread
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:6 - Bias-Annotation
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:7 - Conformance Checklist
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:9 - Consequences
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:10 - Rationale
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:12 - Relations
- A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:End
- A.19.CN:End
- A.19.CHR:End
- A.19.UNM:End
- A.19.UINDM:End
- A.19.USCM:End
- A.19.ULSAM:End
- A.19.CPM:End
- A.19.SelectorMechanism:End
- A.20:End
- A.21:End
- A.22:End
- A.22.CGUS:End
Part B - Trans-disciplinary Reasoning Cluster
- Part B - Trans-disciplinary Reasoning Cluster
- B.1:End
- B.1.1:End
- B.1.2:End
- B.1.3:End
- B.1.4:End
- B.1.5:End
- B.1.5.EW:End
- B.1.5.RS:End
- B.1.6:End
- B.2:End
- B.2.P:End
- B.2.2:End
- B.2.3:End
- B.2.4:End
- B.2.5:End
- B.3:End
- B.3.3 — Assurance Subtypes & Levels
- B.3.3:End
- B.3.4:End
- B.3.5:End
- B.4:End
- B.4.1:End
- B.5:End
- B.5.EA:End
- B.5.WN:End
- B.5.MPC:End
- B.5.MPC.R:End
- B.5.RC:End
- B.5.RA:End
- B.5.RR:End
- B.5.FM:End
- B.5.TU:End
- B.5.TC:End
- B.5.QD:End
- B.5.QD.CF:End
- B.5.1:End
- B.5.2:End
- B.5.2.0:End
- B.5.2.1:End
- B.5.3:End
- B.5.4:End
- B.5.PI:End
Part C - Kernel Extension Specifications
- Part C - Kernel Extension Specifications
- C.2:End
- C.2.1:End
- C.2.P:End
- C.2.2:End
- C.2.2a:End
- C.2.3:End
- C.2.LS:End
- C.2.4:End
- C.2.5:End
- C.2.6:End
- C.2.7:End
- C.2.8:End
- C.2.P.DR:End
- C.3:End
- C.3.1:End
- C.3.2:End
- C.3.3:End
- C.3.4:End
- C.3.5:End
- C.3.A:Annex A - Regulatory and compliance alignment (A/I)
- C.3.A:Annex B - Assurance lanes and evidence design (A/I)
- C.3.A:Annex C - ESG and Method–Work guards
- C.3.A:End
- C.11:End
- C.11.CRC:End
- C.11.DBR:End
- C.11.DUA:End
- C.13 — Constructional Mereology (Compose‑CAL)
- C.13:End
- C.16:End
- C.16.MR:End
- C.16.IR:End
- C.16.RM:End
- C.16.P:End
- C.16.Q:End
- C.17:End
- C.18:End
- C.18.1:End
- C.19:End
- C.19.1:End
- C.19.2:End
- C.20:End
- C.21:End
- C.22:End
- C.22.1:End
- C.22.PFR:End
- C.22.2:End
- C.23:End
- C.24:End
- C.25:End
- C.26:End
- C.26.1:End
- C.26.2:End
- C.26.3:End
- C.27:End
- C.27.TA:End
- C.28:End
- C.28.CM:End
- C.28.MR:End
- C.29:End
- C.29.1:End
- C.29.2:End
- C.29.3:End
- C.29.BB:End
- C.30:End
- C.30.AD:End
- C.30.AD.BA:End
- C.30.P:End
- C.30.STRAT:End
- C.30.ASV:End
- C.30.LCA:End
- C.30.ILC:End
- C.30.TFS-REL - Use Transformation-Flow Structures and Networks in Architecture
- C.30.TFS-REL:1 - Problem frame
- C.30.TFS-REL:2 - Problem
- C.30.TFS-REL:3 - Forces
- C.30.TFS-REL:4 - Solution
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.1 - Use trigger
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.2 - Relation to functional structure
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.3 - Claim-kind applications named by value
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.4 - E.18 selected-structure boundary statement
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.4a - Architecture use of a transformation-flow structure network
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.5 - Worked slices
- C.30.TFS-REL:4.6 - Lowering and currentness conditions
- C.30.TFS-REL:5 - Archetypal Grounding
- C.30.TFS-REL:6 - Bias-Annotation
- C.30.TFS-REL:7 - Conformance Checklist
- C.30.TFS-REL:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
- C.30.TFS-REL:9 - Consequences
- C.30.TFS-REL:10 - Rationale
- C.30.TFS-REL:11 - SoTA-Echoing
- C.30.TFS-REL:12 - Relations
- C.30.TFS-REL:End
- C.31:End
- C.31.RSA:End
- C.31.ASAP:End
- C.32:End
- C.32.P2S:End
- C.32.HCS:End
- C.32.ACS:End
- C.32.ACE:End
- C.32.CONWAY:End
- C.32.MLAO:End
- C.32.MWA:End
- C.32.FAIL:End
- C.32.PAD:End
- C.32.ADR:End
- C.32.ADA:End
- C.33:End
- C.34:End
- C.35:End
- C.36:End
- C.37:End
- C.38:End
- C.39:End
- C.39.RO:End
- C.40:End
- C.40.CD:End
- C.40.CU:End
- C.36.P:End
- C.36.RP:End
Part D - Multi-scale Ethics and Conflict Optimization
Part E - The FPF Constitution and Authoring Guides
- Part E - The FPF Constitution and Authoring Guides
- E.1:End
- E.2:End
- E.2.DA:End
- E.3:End
- E.4:End
- E.4.CM:End
- E.4.FPF:End
- E.4.PFAD:End
- E.4.DPF:End
- E.4.DPF.DA:End
- E.4.PFR:End
- E.4.PFIP:End
- E.5:End
- E.5.1:End
- E.5.2:End
- E.5.3:End
- E.5.4:End
- E.6:End
- E.7:End
- E.8:End
- E.8.ECSPF:End
- E.9:End
- E.9.DA:End
- E.10:End
- E.10.LRN:End
- E.10.INT:End
- E.10.DEV:End
- E.10.MOVE:End
- E.10.ARCH:End
- E.10.ROLE:End
- E.10.P:End
- E.10.D1:End
- E.10.D2:End
- E.11:End
- E.11.PUA:End
- E.11.PUR:End
— - Practical-Use Cards
— - Expansion for
.Preface: - - <FrameworkCode>.Preface:<n>.<m> - <Title>
- E.11.PFP:End
- E.11.DSG:End
- E.12:End
- E.13:End
- E.14:End
- E.15:End
- E.16:End
- E.17.0:End
- E.17.1:End
- E.17.2:End
- E.17:End
- E.17.EFP:End
- E.17.ID.CR:End
- E.17.AUD:End
- E.17.AUD.LHR:End
- E.17.AUD.OOTD:End
- E.18:End
- E.18.1:End
- E.18.2:End
- E.18.3:End
- E.18.NET:End
- E.19:End
- E.20:End
- E.21:End
- E.22:End
- E.23:End
- E.23.CDI:End
- E.23.CAE:End
- E.24:End
- E.24.CD:End
- E.24.PUB:End
- E.24.UK:End
Part F - The Unification Suite (U-Suite): Concept Sets, SenseCells, and System-Role Kinds and Assignments
- Part F - The Unification Suite (U-Suite): Concept Sets, SenseCells, and System-Role Kinds and Assignments
- F.0.1:End
- F.0.2:End
- F.1:End
- F.2 — Source-Local Term Harvesting & Normalisation
- F.2:End
- F.3:End
- F.4:End
- F.5:End
- F.6:End
- F.7:End
- F.8:End
- F.9:End
- F.9.1:End
- F.10:End
- F.11:End
- F.12 — Evaluate Promise Fulfilment from Work Evidence (Service Acceptance)
- F.12:End
- F.13:End
- F.14:End
- F.15:End
- F.16:End
- F.17:End
- F.18:End
- F.19:End
Part G - Discipline SoTA Patterns Kit
- Part G - Discipline SoTA Patterns Kit
- G.Core - Discipline SoTA Kit Invariants, Defaults and Refresh Triggers (Part G)
- G.Core:1 - Problem frame
- G.Core:2 - Problem
- G.Core:3 - Forces
- G.Core:4 - Solution
- G.Core:4.1 - Delegation-first citation for Part‑G‑wide invariants
- G.Core:4.2 - Mandatory G.Core linkage manifest requirement for every G.x
- G.Core:4.2.1 - GCoreLinkageManifest (canonical shape)
- G.Core:4.2.2 - GCoreConformanceProfileId catalogue (compression primitive)
- G.Core:4.2.3 - GCorePinSetId catalogue (compression primitive)
- G.Core:4.3 - RSCR Trigger Catalogue and docking discipline
- G.Core:4.3.1 - Definitions
- G.Core:4.3.2 - Governing-definition model
- G.Core:4.3.3 - Authoring rules
- G.Core:4.3.4 - Canonical trigger catalogue
- G.Core:4.3.4.1 - Canonical kind definitions (normative, minimal)
- G.Core:4.3.4.2 - Canonical trigger sets (compression primitive)
- G.Core:4.3.5 - Initial alias maps
- G.Core:4.4 - Default Governing Definition Index
- G.Core:4.4.1 - Definitions
- G.Core:4.4.2 - Rules
- G.Core:4.4.3 - Default governing definitions
- G.Core:4.5 - ID continuity protocol (Δ‑discipline)
- G.Core:4.6 - Explicit non-goals
- G.Core:5 - Archetypal grounding
- G.Core:6 - Bias-annotation (informative)
- G.Core:7 - Conformance checklist (normative) — CC‑GCORE
- G.Core:8 - Common anti-patterns and how to avoid them
- G.Core:9 - Consequences
- G.Core:10 - Rationale
- G.Core:11 - SoTA alignment (informative)
- G.Core:12 - Relations
- G.Core:End
- G.0:End
- G.1:End
- G.2:End
- G.3:End
- G.4:End
- G.5:End
- G.6:End
- G.7:End
- G.8:End
- G.9 — Parity and Benchmark Harness
- G.9:0 — Use this when
- G.9:0.1 — What goes wrong if missed
- G.9:0.2 — What this buys
- G.9:1 — Intent
- G.9:2 — Problem frame
- G.9:3 — Forces
- G.9:4 — Solution
- G.9:4.0 — G.Core linkage (normative)
- G.9:4.1 — Objects and publication records
- G.9:4.2 — Parity planning (one exact U.WorkPlan)
- G.9:4.3 — Execution protocol (run‑time / selector‑adjacent)
- G.9:4.3a — Worked parity slice
- G.9:4.3b — Conditional causal method rung parity
- G.9:4.9 — Extensions (pattern‑scoped; non‑core)
- G.9:5 — Interfaces (minimal I/O; conceptual)
- G.9:6 — Conformance Checklist (CC‑G9)
- G.9:7 — Anti‑patterns and remedies
- G.9:8 — Archetypal grounding (informative; SoTA‑oriented)
- G.9:9 — Cited Records (what this pattern publishes)
- G.9:10 — Relations
- G.9:11 — Working reading checks
- G.9:End
- G.10:End
- G.11:End
- G.12 — DHC Dashboards (Discipline-Health Time Series and Views)
- G.12:0 — Use This When
- G.12:1 — Intent
- G.12:2 — Problem Frame
- G.12:3 — Forces
- G.12:4 — Solution
- G.12:4.0 — G.Core linkage
- G.12:4.1 — Objects
- G.12:4.2 — Method of obtaining the result
- G.12:4.9 — Optional Extensions
- G.12:5 — Interfaces
- G.12:6 — Conformance Checklist
- G.12:7 — Bias-Annotation
- G.12:8 — Consequences
- G.12:9 — Relations
- G.12:10 — Author's Quick Checklist
- G.12:11 — Worked Micro-examples
- G.12:End
- G.13:End
Part H - Reserved
Last Updated: 2026-10-12 — upstream FPF commit f2bc67dd (github.com/ailev/FPF)