COMMUNICATION-FOR-USE — Make communication useful, then learn from what happens
Preface node
heading:communication-for-use-make-communication-useful-then-learn-from-what-happens:612
What this page is
This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.
Methodology
Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.
Content
- Situation: A report, model, message, or answer seems clear, but its intended use and evidence are unclear, including whether its producer can use it later.
- Question: Who should understand or do what with it, what evidence is enough, and what should change if that use is not achieved?
- First useful result or blocker: A supported decision to keep or repair it, change prerequisites or a future use, or stop, with evidence, causation, and permission limits.
- Start with: Use
A.2.9to judge the communication against what its recipient should understand or do. Distinguish the act from its wording and medium, and interpretation from response, later action, world change and causal contribution. For the repair question that arises, useA.6.3.CRfor wording,A.6.3.RTfor representation, orA.6.3.NAR/E.17.EFP/E.24.PUBfor narrative, explanation or publication. UseA.10for evidence,C.28for causation andC.11to compare repair options only when needed. A repair may change prerequisites, medium, interaction or future use. Check authority, consent and admissibility separately. - Stop or return: Stop when the named use has enough support or a blocker is explicit. Preserve the earlier intended use when interpreting the response; revise a future use when warranted. Response or silence alone proves neither meaning, success, causation, authority, consent, nor permission.
Last Updated: 2026-10-12 — upstream FPF commit f2bc67dd (github.com/ailev/FPF)