Pattern Catalog
New here? Start at the orientation page — work packets, glossary, and the right entry point per task. Use this catalog when you need to audit the full FPF reference, open an exact ID, or compare neighboring patterns by Part.
What this page is
This is the full generated catalog of FPF pattern IDs from the published FPF snapshot. It is not the first adoption path and it is not a FPF Reference product feature list.
Generated pages: 357
Part A - Kernel Architecture Cluster
- A.0 - Generative Search Onboarding Glossary (NQD & E/E‑LOG)
- A.1 - Recognize a Whole with Parts (U.Holon and Admitted Holon Kinds)
- A.1.1 - Bounded Model-Use Structure: Applicability, Use and Expression Coherence (DDD Bounded Context)
- A.1.CSD - Discovering Systems That May Bear Consequences
- A.1.RI - Reidentifying an Object across Observations
- A.1.SCR - Finding the Acting or Changed System
- A.1.STM - Find the First Unsupported Project Dependency (System-Thinking Long Mantra)
- A.2 - System-Role Kinds and Assignments
- A.2.1 - U.SystemRoleAssignment - Contextual System-Role Assignment
- A.2.2 - System Capability: Conditions, Measures and Fit
- A.2.3 - U.PromiseContent — Promised Outcomes and Acceptance Criteria
- A.2.4 - Episteme Evidence-Use and Status-Use Relations
- A.2.5 - SystemRoleAssignmentStateRelation - Assignment-State Recognition for Work Admission
- A.2.6 - Unified Scope Mechanism (USM): Test Scope Membership and Combine Scopes
- A.2.7 - SystemRoleKindRelationStructure - Relations among System-Role Kinds
- A.2.8 - U.Commitment — Individual Duties to Act or Refrain
- A.2.8.PER - Granted Permission, Exercise, and Non-Prohibition
- A.2.9 - U.SpeechAct — Communicative Work and Its Intended Use
- A.3 - Transformer Quartet: Distinguish Work, Performer, Method and Method Description
- A.3.1 - U.Method: Reusable Way of Doing with Explicit Applicability
- A.3.1.MR - Candidate-Method Recovery from Work Evidence
- A.3.2 - U.MethodDescription: Description Episteme for a Way of Doing
- A.3.3 - U.Dynamics: State-Space and Transition-Law Episteme
- A.3.3.CC - Construct a Configuration Description under Constraints
- A.3.3.PI - Retain the Information Needed for Prediction
- A.3.3.TR - Construct a Rule for State Change
- A.3.4 - U.Transformation: Actual Bounded Change Under Conditions
- A.3.4.P - Transformation Wording Repair: Recover Objects and Claims
- A.4 - Compare a System's Intended Design with Its Operating Conditions
- A.5 - Open-Ended FPF Kernel and Extension Layering
- A.6 - Signature Stack: Classify and Place Boundary Claims
- A.6.0 - U.Signature - Reusable Law-Governed Declaration Episteme
- A.6.1 - U.Mechanism - Reusable Law-Governed Operation Declaration
- A.6.2 - Effect-Free Episteme Morphing: Laws for Mathematical Relations Between Epistemes
- A.6.3 - Episteme viewing - EntityOfConcern-preserving episteme construction
- A.6.3.CR - ConservativeRetextualization: EntityOfConcern-Preserving Textual Re-Expression
- A.6.3.CSC - Controlled Semantic Coarsening: Shorten an Account for a Bounded Use
- A.6.3.NAR - Structure-to-Narrative Rendering
- A.6.3.RT - Representation-Scheme Transition: Change Representation of the Same EntityOfConcern
- A.6.3.RT.OE - Construct an Operative Expression
- A.6.4 - EntityOfConcern Retargeting: Judge a Bounded Use Across Different Entities
- A.6.5 - Relation-Declaration Slot Discipline - SlotKind, ValueKind, RefKind, and participant-designation discipline
- A.6.6 - Base Declaration Discipline: Say Exactly What Something Depends On
- A.6.7 - MechSuiteDescription — Shared Conditions for Joint Use of Distinct Mechanisms
- A.6.9 - Cross-Context Sameness Disambiguation - Restoring the concrete claim behind "same / equivalent / align" (RPR-XCTX)
- A.6.A - Affordance and Action-Invitation Precision Restoration (ACT-INV)
- A.6.B - Boundary Norm Square (Laws / Admissibility / Deontics / Work-Effects)
- A.6.C - Contract Unpacking for Boundaries
- A.6.F - Function and Functional Precision Restoration (RPR-FUNCTION)
- A.6.H - Wholeness Language Unpacking (RPR-WHOLE)
- A.6.M - Module and Interface Claim Repair
- A.6.P - Relational Precision Restoration — Recovering Direct Relations from Under-Specified Claims
- A.6.P.RI - Recover Agent-Relative References for Action
- A.6.P.WMR - Exact Relation Recovery for Method and Work Claims
- A.6.RCD - Needed Relation Claim Derivation and Relation-Kind Admission
- A.6.REL - Relation Obtaining and Individuation: Distinguish Occurrences When Needed
- A.6.RSIG - Recognition Signatures: Find the Defining Episteme for a Description
- A.6.RSIR - Relation, Signature, Interface, Role, and Slot Precision Restoration
- A.6.S - TargetSignature and optional ConstructorSignature - demand-driven signature engineering
- A.7 - Strict Distinction: Repair Conflations of FPF Objects (Clarity Lattice)
- A.7.1 - Consequence-Guided Ontological Problem Solving
- A.7.2 - FPF Ontology-Premise Reconciliation
- A.7.CP - Constructive-Premise Compact and Reasoning-Basis Use
- A.8 - Universal Core Principle: Test a U-Kind Across Domains
- A.9 - Choose and Check an Aggregation Law for the Intended Result
- A.10 - Evidence Graph Referring: Claim-Bound Evidence and Provenance Graph
- A.10.1 - Revalidate Affected Uses When a Relied-on Source Changes
- A.11 - Ontological Parsimony
- A.11.OP - Decision-Relevant Least Action and Operational Parsimony: Test a Proposed Requirement
- A.12 - Acting-Side Externalization and Reflexive Split: Identify Who Acts on What
- A.13 - The Agential Role & Agency Spectrum
- A.14 - Advanced Mereology: Components, Portions, Aspects & Phases
- A.15 - System-Role–Method–Work Alignment
- A.15.1 - U.Work: Dated Performed Work Occurrence
- A.15.2 - U.WorkPlan: Plan Content for Coordinating Future Work
- A.15.3 - SlotFillingsPlanItem: Plan a Value for an Existing Declaration Member
- A.15.4 - Work-Relevant Appearance-Based Reliance Repair
- A.15.5 - Work-Entry Readiness and Full-Kit Preparation
- A.15.6 - Recover What Project, Process, or Case Wording Refers To
- A.15.7 - Situation-Responsive Work Steering and Next-Action Selection
- A.15.8 - Work-Performance Configuration and Recovery Testing
- A.15.9 - Use or Request a Bounded Result from Another Practice
- A.15.10 - Resume Interrupted Work
- A.15.11 - Make Applicable Methods Noticeable in Work
- A.15.PROD - Production Work, Entity-Identity Inception, and Production Completion Recovery
- A.16 - Language-State Moves: Choose the Next Publication and Use of a Cue or Claim
- A.16.0 - Keep an Episteme's Language-State and Publication History Recoverable
- A.16.1 - PreArticulationCuePack: Preserve an Early Cue Before Choosing Its Use
- A.16.2 - Reopen, SketchBackoff, Respecify, or Retire a Language-State Publication
- A.17 - Canonical “Characteristic” (A.CHR-NORM): Name What Is Measured
- A.18 - A.CSLC-KERNEL — Minimal CSLC in Kernel (Characteristic/Scale/Level/Coordinate)
- A.19 - CharacteristicSpace: Coordinates, State Predicates and Dynamics Hook (A.CHR‑SPACE)
- A.19.CHR - CHRMechanismSuite: Shared Rules for Characterization and Selection
- A.19.CN - CN-frame: Specify and Maintain Comparability and Normalization
- A.19.CPM - Compare Admitted Profiles under a Declared Comparator (CPM)
- A.19.ECS - Evaluation CharacteristicSpace Construction: Define What Counts as Better
- A.19.SelectorMechanism - Unified Selection Kernel (SelectorMechanism)
- A.19.SPR - Repair State and Status Wording
- A.19.UINDM - Indicatorization (UINDM): Select Indicators Under a Declared Policy
- A.19.ULSAM - Unified Lawful Scale Aggregation Mechanism (ULSAM)
- A.19.UNM - Normalize Coordinate Values under Declared Invariants (UNM)
- A.19.USCM - Unified Scoring Mechanism (USCM)
- A.20 - Constraint Validity for Transformation Steps
- A.21 - Gate Decisions from Independent Check Results
- A.22 - Structure and Structural Views (STRUCT-CAL)
- A.22.CGUS - Which Continuations Are Available? — Constraint-Governed Unfolding Structure (CGUS)
Part B - Trans-disciplinary Reasoning Cluster
- B.1 - Holon Aggregation and Part-Whole Construction
- B.1.1 - Dependency Structure and Relation Grounding
- B.1.2 - Coordinate Decisions About System Aggregation and Delimitation
- B.1.3 - Knowledge Aggregation (Γ_epist): Synthesis and Target-Scheme Compilation
- B.1.4 - Specify Order-Sensitive or Temporal Aggregation (Γctx, Γtime)
- B.1.5 - Gamma_method - Order-Sensitive Method Composition and Work Enactment
- B.1.5.EW - Recover How Constituent Actions Enact Encompassing Work
- B.1.5.RS - Evaluate a Constituent Method Replacement in Its Encompassing Uses
- B.1.6 - Work-Resource Aggregation
- B.2 - Meta-Holon Transition — Whole Reidentification
- B.2.2 - Meta-System Transition: Test the Proposed New Whole as a System
- B.2.3 - Meta-Holon Transition With Episteme Result
- B.2.4 - Do Capability or Functioning Changes Require Whole Reidentification?
- B.2.5 - Supervisor-Subholon Feedback Relation
- B.2.P - Clarify Emergence and Meta-Holon Transition (MHT) Claims
- B.3 - Is This Claim Supported for This Use? — Trust and Assurance Calculus
- B.3.3 - Assurance Subtypes & Levels
- B.3.4 - Can Earlier Evidence Still Support This Use? — Evidence Decay and Epistemic Debt
- B.3.5 - Assurance Grounding for Working-Model Relation Claims (CT2R-LOG)
- B.4 - Coordinate Repeated Adaptation (Canonical Evolution Loop)
- B.4.1 - Publish Candidate Routes for a Stabilized Cue (RoutedCueSet)
- B.5 - Choose the Next Reasoning Contribution (Canonical Reasoning Cycle)
- B.5.1 - Coordinate Development States: Explore → Shape → Evidence → Operate
- B.5.2 - Generate and Compare Candidate Explanations (Abductive Loop)
- B.5.2.0 - Question Form for Entering Abduction (U.AbductivePrompt)
- B.5.2.1 - Instrument Abductive Hypothesis Generation with Novelty–Quality–Diversity (NQD)
- B.5.3 - Interpret Domain Vocabulary for an FPF Claim (Domain-Concept Bridge)
- B.5.4 - Recognize a Reusable Concept in a Concrete Situation
- B.5.EA - Articulate a Working Distinction from Experience
- B.5.FM - Construct a First Model for the Working Question
- B.5.MPC - Connect Physical, Mathematical and Computational Reasoning
- B.5.MPC.R - Repair a Physical-Mathematical-Computational Connection
- B.5.PI - Initiate Inquiry from Ongoing Work
- B.5.QD - Develop a New Question from a Result or Construction
- B.5.QD.CF - Reformulate a Problem by Examining Its Conflicting Assumptions
- B.5.RA - Recover an Argument for Its Next Use
- B.5.RC - Recover a Construction from Its Description
- B.5.RR - Revise Reasoning After a Premise or Question Changes
- B.5.TC - Compare Theoretical Accounts for a Working Question
- B.5.TU - Construct a Working Use of an Unfamiliar Theory
- B.5.WN - Develop Lines of Thought with Working Notes
Part C - Kernel Extension Specifications
- C.1 - Physical System State, Conservation, and Resource-Flow Calculus (Sys-CAL)
- C.2 - Epistemic holon composition (KD-CAL)
- C.2.1 - U.Episteme: Constitution, Empirical Grounding, and Edition Relations
- C.2.2 - Reliability R in the F–G–R triad
- C.2.3 - Unified Formality Characteristic F
- C.2.4 - U.ArticulationExplicitness — How Explicit Is an Episteme's Meaning for Its Use?
- C.2.5 - U.LanguageStateClosureDegree — How Fixed Is the Current Candidate Space?
- C.2.6 - U.LanguageStateAnchoringMode — How Is the Episteme Anchored?
- C.2.7 - U.LanguageStateRepresentationFactorBundle — How Is the Representation Organized?
- C.2.8 - U.ExtractableStructuralInformation — Structure This Reader Can Recover
- C.2.2a - U.LanguageStateSpace - Language-state chart over U.CharacteristicSpace
- C.2.LS - U.LanguageStateFacetProfile - Thin profile bundle for language-state facets
- C.2.P - Clarify Episteme, Publication, and Source Wording (Epistemic Precision Restoration)
- C.2.P.DR - Repair Claims Based on Declarative Form Alone (Declarative Representation Precision Restoration)
- C.3 - Kinds, Intent and Extent, and Typed Reasoning
- C.3.1 - Kind Identity and Subkind Relations (U.Kind and U.SubkindOf)
- C.3.2 - Kind Intent, Membership Judgment, and Extension
- C.3.3 - KindBridge and CL^k — Correspondence between Distinct Kinds
- C.3.4 - KindUseAdaptationDeclaration — Tailor the Use of an Existing Kind
- C.3.5 - KindAT — Intentional Abstraction Facet for Kinds (K0…K3)
- C.3.A - Typed Guard Macros for Kinds + USM (Annex)
- C.5 - Resource Use and Work-Cost Calculus (Resrc-CAL)
- C.6 - Proof and Inference Use Calculus (LOG-CAL)
- C.9 - Agency Characteristic Profile
- C.11 - Decision Theory (Decsn-CAL)
- C.11.CRC - Configuration-Relative Contribution Comparison
- C.11.DBR - Reconsider a Decision When Its Relied-on Basis Changes
- C.11.DUA - Make Advice and Evidence Demands Worth Their Burden
- C.13 - Constructional Mereology (Compose‑CAL)
- C.14 - System-of-Systems and Infrastructure Calculus (M-Sys-CAL)
- C.16 - Measurement & Metrics Characterization (MM‑CHR)
- C.16.IR - Determine What a Measurement Indication Can Resolve
- C.16.MR - Construct a Measurement Relation
- C.16.P - Restore Precision to Characteristic and Scale Wording
- C.16.Q - Quality-Term Precision Restoration
- C.16.RM - Repair a Measurement Model or Arrangement
- C.17 - Characterising Generative Novelty and Value
- C.18 - Open-Ended Search Archive and Front Stewardship
- C.18.1 - Scaling‑Law Lens Binding (SLL)
- C.19 - Explore-Exploit Live-Pool Governor
- C.19.1 - Bitter‑Lesson Preference (BLP)
- C.19.2 - Use-Bounded Apparatus Application
- C.20 - Composition of U.Discipline (Discipline-CAL)
- C.21 - Field Health & Structure (Discipline-CHR)
- C.22 - Task Typing and TaskSignature Assignment (Problem-CHR)
- C.22.1 - Task-family adaptation signature
- C.22.2 - ProblemCard
- C.22.PFR - Problematic-For Relation
- C.23 - MethodFamily Evidence & Maturity (Method‑SoS‑LOG)
- C.24 - Plan Tool or Service Calls for a Fixed Action (C.Agent-Tools-CAL)
- C.25 - Q-Bundle: Express a Quality Claim as One Characteristic or a Structured Bundle
- C.26 - Quantum-Like Modeling Lens
- C.26.1 - Probe-Coupled Boundary Interaction
- C.26.2 - Enacted Distributed State Evidence
- C.26.3 - Viability-Envelope Boundary Regulation
- C.27 - Temporal Claim Adequacy: State Readings, Temporal Trends, and Intervention-Sensitive Change
- C.27.TA - Temporal Aspect: Time Windows, Rhythm, Cadence, and Currentness
- C.28 - CausalUse-CAL: Causal-Use Questions, Identification, and Realizability
- C.28.CM - Construct and Challenge a Causal Model
- C.28.MR - Derive an Intervention Consequence by Mechanism Replacement
- C.29 - Mathematical Lens Use
- C.29.1 - Mathematical Result Transfer
- C.29.2 - Computational Formulation
- C.29.3 - Computational Realization
- C.29.BB - Construct a Balance across a Boundary
- C.30 - Grounded Architecture and Selected-Structure Adequacy
- C.30.AD - Architecture Description Adequacy
- C.30.AD.BA - Built-Asset Architecture Description and Reference Designation
- C.30.ASV - Architecture Structural View Adequacy (ASV)
- C.30.ILC - Cross-Scope Architecture Residual Triage
- C.30.LCA - Control Structure View Adequacy (LCA)
- C.30.P - Clarify Architecture and Structure Wording (Precision Restoration)
- C.30.STRAT - Clarify Stratification and Architecture Source Labels
- C.31 - Modularity and Reusable Structure Characteristics
- C.31.ASAP - Which Architecture Is Preferable Under Scale? (Scale Amenability)
- C.31.RSA - Reusable Structure Accounting
- C.32 - Architecture Candidate Synthesis
- C.32.ACE - Architecture Characteristic Eval Programs
- C.32.ACS - Architecture Characteristic Criteria Set
- C.32.ADA - Architecture Decision Adequacy Scales
- C.32.ADR - Architecture Decision Record Projection
- C.32.CONWAY - Architecture-Influence and Transformed-Architecture Correspondence
- C.32.FAIL - Architecture Failure Recognition and Repair
- C.32.HCS - Architecture-Bearing Family Characteristic Starter Packs
- C.32.MLAO - Architecture Candidates to Reduce Cross-Scope Residuals
- C.32.MWA - Synthesize an Architecture Account of Methods and Their Use
- C.32.P2S - Problem-to-Structure Architecturing Unfolding
- C.32.PAD - Project Architecture Decision After Candidate Synthesis
- C.33 - Assess Structural Information for Architecture Use
- C.34 - Assess Structural Correspondence for Architecture Use (Equivalence and Morphisms)
- C.35 - Assess Generated or Discovered Results for Architecture Use
- C.36 - Cultural Evolution and Cultural-Evolution Engineering
- C.36.P - Clarify Cultural-Evolution Wording for a Claim or Action
- C.36.RP - Sustain and Renew Shared Ways of Working
- C.37 - Select and Use Representations for One Action
- C.38 - Construct Comparable Ways to Obtain One Result
- C.39 - Find and Develop a Way to Obtain a Result
- C.39.RO - Turn a Construction into a Reusable Operation
- C.40 - Develop Branching Search from Reusable Material
- C.40.CD - Develop Problems and Ways of Solving Them Together
- C.40.CU - Develop a Useful and Reproducible Use of a Construct
Part D - Multi-scale Ethics and Conflict Optimization
- D.1 - Clarify an Ethical Claim's Value Basis (Value Plurality)
- D.2 - Recognize Ethical Concerns Across Levels and Scopes (Multilevel Ethics)
- D.3 - Describe an Ethical Conflict Across Levels or Scopes
- D.4 - Ethical Mediation and Decision Use
- D.5 - Bias Audit and Ethical Assurance
Part E - The FPF Constitution and Authoring Guides
- E.1 - Vision & Mission
- E.2 - FPF's Eleven Pillars and Bitter-Lesson Preference (BLP)
- E.2.DA - Evaluate How FPF Realizes Its Pillars (Pillar-Adequacy CharacteristicSpace)
- E.3 - Principle Taxonomy, Precedence and Agent Autonomy Profiles (ABL)
- E.4 - FPF Ecosystem Architecture: Framework Families, Products and DPF Suites
- E.4.CM - Develop Connected Methods as Framework Contributions
- E.4.DPF - Domain and Local Principle Frameworks: Whether and How to Author and Publish
- E.4.DPF.DA - Evaluate a DPF or LPF Package for Its Declared Use (Package-Adequacy CharacteristicSpace)
- E.4.FPF - FPF Edition Assembly: Publication Forms, Carriers and Access Routes
- E.4.PFAD - Principle-Framework Architecture Decision
- E.4.PFIP - Principle-Framework Publication Integration and Preservation
- E.4.PFR - Pattern-Framework Relation and Edition Discipline
- E.5 - Four Guard-Rails of FPF
- E.5.1 - DevOps Lexical Firewall
- E.5.2 - Notational Independence
- E.5.3 - Unidirectional Dependency between FPF Families
- E.5.4 - Cross-Disciplinary Bias Audit
- E.6 - Didactic Architecture of the FPF Specification
- E.7 - Archetypal Grounding: Explain Rules of FPF Architectural Patterns through Cases
- E.8 - FPF Authoring Conventions & Style Guide
- E.8.ECSPF - Author an FPF Pattern from an Accepted Evaluation CharacteristicSpace Specification
- E.9 - Design-Rationale Record (DRR) for FPF Content Decisions
- E.9.DA - Evaluate a DRR for Its Declared Authoring Use (Decision-Adequacy CharacteristicSpace)
- E.10 - Unified Lexical Rules for FPF
- E.10.ARCH - Wording-Use Ontological Precision Restoration Architecture
- E.10.D1 - Recovering What “Context” Means in Use
- E.10.D2 - EntityOfConcern, Description Episteme, and Specification-Use Discipline
- E.10.DEV - Recovering What Development or Evolution Means in the Current Claim
- E.10.INT - Recovering What Interest or Curiosity Means Here
- E.10.LRN - Recovering What “Learning” Means in the Current Claim
- E.10.MOVE - Move, Readiness and Trajectory Wording Precision Restoration
- E.10.P - Conceptual Prefixes (policy & registry)
- E.10.ROLE - Recovering What “Role” Means in the Current Claim
- E.11 - First-Practical Entry and Pattern-Use Discoverability Discipline
- E.11.DSG - DPF Suite Reference
- E.11.PFP - Framework Publication Form Profile for Markdown
- E.11.PUA - Pattern Use in a Working Situation and First Useful Result
- E.11.PUR - Pattern-Use Applicability, Recommendation, and Coordination
- E.12 - Didactic Primacy & Cognitive Ergonomics
- E.13 - Pragmatic Utility and Proxy-to-Value Alignment
- E.14 - Human-Centric Working-Model: Readable Claims and Recoverable Assurance
- E.15 - Pattern Change, Edition Continuity, and Impact Analysis
- E.16 - RoC‑Autonomy Budget & Enforcement
- E.17 - Multi‑View Publication Kit
- E.17.0 - Viewpoint and View Recognition for Multi-View Describing
- E.17.1 - Viewpoint Bundle Library — Reusable Viewpoint Reference Bundles
- E.17.2 - TEVB — Project-local Typical Engineering Viewpoint Bundle Template for Holons
- E.17.AUD - PublicationUnit Stability Discipline
- E.17.AUD.LHR - PublicationUnit Stability Discipline and Local Head Restoration
- E.17.AUD.OOTD - PublicationUnit Primary-Subject Discipline
- E.17.EFP - ExplanationFaithfulnessProfile — explanation-use discipline over existing MVPK faces
- E.17.ID.CR - Compare Sources Within a Shared Review Frame (ComparativeReviewUnit)
- E.18 - Transformation Flow Structure
- E.18.1 - P2W Problem-to-Work Carry-Through
- E.18.2 - Transformation Flow Mathematical Description
- E.18.3 - Constraint-Governed Transformation-Flow Unfolding Structure
- E.18.NET - Network of Transformation-Flow Structures
- E.19 - Pattern Quality Gates: Review and Refresh Profiles
- E.20 - Mechanism Introduction Protocol: Introduce or Revise FPF Mechanisms (MIP)
- E.21 - FPF Pattern-Quality Evaluation CharacteristicSpace
- E.22 - Improvement-Oriented Quality Evaluation Question Framing
- E.23 - Quality Improvement Loop Method
- E.23.CAE - Capability Access and Expression Differential Probe
- E.23.CDI - Developing Capability for a Named Work Family
- E.24 - U.Ontic and Ontic Introduction Discipline
- E.24.CD - Ontic Candidate Detection and First-Use Disposition
- E.24.PUB - Episteme Publication: Availability, Form and Carrier
- E.24.UK - U-kind Admission and Ontic Settlement
Part F - The Unification Suite (U-Suite): Concept Sets, SenseCells, and System-Role Kinds and Assignments
- F.0.1 - Source-Local Meaning Recovery
- F.0.2 - Semantic Synthesis across Source Ontologies
- F.1 - Find and Select Sources for a Current Question
- F.2 - Source-Local Term Harvesting & Normalisation
- F.3 - Source-Local Sense Clustering
- F.4 - SystemRoleKindDescription — Describing an Exact System-Role Kind
- F.5 - Name U-kinds, Local System-Role Kinds and SystemRoleKindDescriptions
- F.6 - SystemRoleAssignment and Performed-Work Attribution Check
- F.7 - Display Source-Local Comparisons in a Concept-Set Table
- F.8 - Mint-or-Reuse Decision for a Name
- F.9 - Relate Local Meanings across Contexts (Alignment and Bridge)
- F.9.1 - Bridge Stance Note — Clarify a Bounded Use
- F.10 - Apply and Interpret Evidence, Standard and Requirement Statuses
- F.11 - Distinguish Method, MethodDescription, Work and Outputs
- F.12 - Evaluate Promise Fulfilment from Work Evidence (Service Acceptance)
- F.13 - Lexical Continuity & Deprecation
- F.14 - Anti-Explosion Control for System-Role and Status Name Families
- F.15 - Static and Regression Conformance Harness for Naming and Semantic Unification
- F.16 - Worked-Example Template (Cross-Domain)
- F.17 - Make a Settled Naming Decision Recoverable for Reuse (Unified Term Sheet)
- F.18 - Local-First Unification Naming Protocol
- F.19 - Ontology-First Plain Technical Rewriting
Part G - Discipline SoTA Patterns Kit
- G.0 - Define Admissible Comparison and Aggregation for a Frame (CG-Spec)
- G.1 - Author a Reusable CG-Frame Generator and Selector Kit
- G.2 - Harvest and Synthesize SoTA for a CG-Frame
- G.3 - CHR Authoring: Characteristics - Scales - Levels - Coordinates
- G.4 - CAL Authoring: Calculi - Acceptance - Evidence
- G.5 - Method-Family Registry, Dispatch and Selected-Set Result Declaration
- G.6 - Evidence Graph and Provenance Ledger: Citable Evidence-Provenance Paths
- G.7 - Cross-Tradition Bridge Calibration Kit (BridgeMatrix → BridgeCards + BCT/Sentinels)
- G.8 - Package Method-Family Admissibility Rules and Maturity Ladders (SoS-LOG)
- G.9 - Parity / Benchmark Harness
- G.10 - SoTA Pack Shipping (pack-boundary governing definition; SoTA-Pack(Core))
- G.11 - Decide Whether and How to Refresh SoTA Packs and Related Results (Telemetry and Decay)
- G.12 - DHC Dashboards (Discipline-Health Time Series and Views)
- G.13 - External Interop Hooks for SoTA Discipline Packs (conceptual; normative when used)
Last Updated: 2026-10-12 — upstream FPF commit f2bc67dd (github.com/ailev/FPF)